Skip to main content

Should Employees Buy Their Own Computers?

Should Employees Buy Their Own Computers?: "Local ID10T writes
'Data security vs. productivity. We have all heard the arguments. Most of us use some of our personal equipment for work, but is it a good idea? 'You are at work. Your computer is five years old, runs Windows XP. Your company phone has a tiny screen and doesn't know what the internet is. Idling at home is a snazzy, super-fast laptop, and your own smartphone is barred from accessing work e-mail. There's a reason for that: IT provisioning is an expensive business. Companies can struggle to keep up with the constant rate of technological change. The devices employees have at home and in their pockets are often far more powerful than those provided for them. So what if you let your staff use their own equipment?' Companies such as Microsoft, Intel, Kraft, Citrix, and global law firm SNR Denton seem to think it's a decent idea.'

What stops this company from providing inferior equipment to push the employee into using their own money to pay for this equipment? How many of these employees understand the tax issues related to this?

What about liability? If there is a breach and it is traced to the employee-owned equipment, can the employee be held liable too?

Comments

  1. jakrpandaJanuary 14, 2011 at 5:02 PM

    We should buy our own office furniture too. That shit is super expensive.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On sleep deprivation and Incan Monkey Gods

From: Dilbert comic strip for 08/03/1992 from the official Dilbert comic strips archive. I was trying to show this strip to a coworker who is dangerously toying with the harsh mistress that is Insomnia. What shocked me is how quickly I was able to look up the strip, which was published when he was just 11 years old, and two weeks before my just-out-of-college ass shipped out to US Army Basic Training.
Post a Comment
Read more

Add custom speed settings to your ifit map workout

Ifit.com allows you to build a workout walk/race/bike route simply by clicking on a Google Maps interface. You can then use a compatible ifit-enabled workout machine to recreate the route automatically. The problem is that the user interface still isn't final, so there are features in place that aren't exactly obvious. For example, if you create a workout your machine starts at 1 MPH, because that's the default. But how to set it to start at say, 3 MPH? Easy, just switch from map view to graph view: That button switches from the Google Maps interface to a chart that allows you to visualize and control effort: You can't change the elevation, this is fixed due to the geography that you selected. But you can drag the yellow (speed line) to change the speed of your device.  What if you want to have segments at different speeds? Easy, just click and drag and it will break the line, and you can drag each segment of the line independently: ...
1 comment
Read more

Software Entropy and the Strangler Fig: Surviving a 20-Year-Old Codebase

Right now, I find myself fighting a three-front war. Front one is keeping a 20-year-old behemoth of a B2B application alive. We are talking about decades of legacy ASP.NET and VB.NET where two decades of tweaks, patches, and "temporary fixes" have become permanent, load-bearing pillars of the architecture. Every time I touch it, it feels like playing Operation with oven mitts on—spending 90% of my week untangling logic just so a simple bug fix doesn’t cause a ripple effect that crashes a critical service. Front two is modernizing the architecture. I am actively trying to implement a rudimentary Strangler Fig pattern—slowly carving out legacy functionality and pushing it into a clean, testable shared library project so we can actually run proper unit tests and stop the bleeding. Front three is modernizing the team. While keeping the lights on and quietly rebuilding the engine, I am also pushing a retraining effort to get my peers up to current framework versions and embracing ...
Post a Comment
Read more